Mental health content can cause real harm when it oversimplifies a diagnosis, downplays a risk, or gives false reassurance. Our review process exists to catch those problems before a page reaches a reader who needs accurate information.
The review standard matches the clinical sensitivity of the content. A page about journaling habits doesn't carry the same risk as a page about suicidal ideation.
Each reviewer holds an active license in their field and has direct clinical experience with the populations and conditions covered on this site.
Licensed Clinical Psychologist
Dr. Patel reviews condition guides for clinical accuracy, risk language, and whether the recommendations match current standards of care.
Licensed Clinical Social Worker
Ellis reviews crisis, access, and support-planning content to keep guidance realistic for readers navigating cost, privacy, and logistics.
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist
Dr. Hart reviews relationship and family-systems pages for nuance, safety, and guidance that readers can use without oversimplifying conflict.
If you spot a factual error, misleading framing, or outdated information on any page, we want to know. Corrections help us serve readers better.